Authority orders Viv Beck be reinstated at Heart of the City

Thursday 4:35pm
Heart of the City chief executive Viv Beck said there were 'deep grievances' over disruption caused by City Rail Link. Heart of the City chief executive Viv Beck said there were 'deep grievances' over disruption caused by City Rail Link.

Auckland's Heart of the City has been ordered by the Employment Relations Authority to reinstate chief executive Viv Beck on an interim basis.

Heart of the City (HOTC) represents more than 15,000 businesses in Auckland's CBD and receives Business Improvement District (BID) funding through a targeted rate paid by businesses.

Beck, chief executive for 10 years, was suspended on March 27.

The ERA on May 15 found that Beck had an "arguable case" that she was unjustifiably suspended, and that there was strength in her submissions that the suspension was enacted before it was decided what the allegations were.

The decision by authority member Nicola Craig outlined that HOTC placed the start of the breakdown in relationship with Beck to October 2025, with the unanticipated release of a business survey's results.

Beck disputed this, and said tensions were more recent.

The decision gave a timeline showing Beck was notified of her suspension a week after she raised concerns about the constitutional eligibility and conflicts of interest of the new chairperson, appointed in February.

It quoted the suspension letter dated 27 March, which included high-level concerns with Beck including "poor communication", "breakdown of trust and confidence between you and the committee", "hostile behaviour towards committee members" and "withholding of information said to be important to the committee's functions".

Craig said it took two weeks for the committee to provide details of those concerns to Beck, three weeks before an independent investigator was appointed, and another week to send draft terms of reference for comment.

"I am satisfied on an interim assessment that Ms Beck has an arguable case that Heart of the City failed to act as a fair and reasonable employer could have done, including the procedural steps outlined in s 103A(3) of the act, raising concerns and giving an opportunity for response."

Craig said HOTC's grounds for suspension were largely related to potential impact on the upcoming investigation and stakeholder implications.

She said while HOTC had since provided detailed concerns for Beck's actions, "there is little to establish that the nominated risks make it impractical or unreasonable for her to be reinstated".

There are steps HOTC could put in place to reduce difficulties, including having a key contact person from the committee for Beck to liaise with, and instruct her to not discuss the investigation with her colleagues, Craig said.

Craig also concluded that Beck had an "arguable case" for permanent reinstatement, but added that her case may be altered on the basis of further evidence on why her removal from the workplace was necessary.

'I'm delighted to be returning'

Beck told RNZ she's very pleased with the ERA ruling.

"I'm delighted to be returning to my role supporting city centre businesses, it's a very important turn around year in the city centre after a decade of major disruption.

"And it's critical that Heart of the City can fully focus on the regeneration and the economic benefit of businesses," she said.

Asked about HOTC's concerns with her, Beck said she's not going to comment and that her focus is getting back on the job.

When asked about her pending personal grievance case against HOTC, and the ERA saying that the case for her permanent reinstatement could still be altered on the basis of further evidence, Beck said there's a variety of things to happen in the next little while, but she can't comment now.

"Although the non-publication order has been lifted, HOTC remains under a legal obligation not to comment on individual employment matters," a spokesperson for HOTC Executive Committee said in a statement.

"Regarding the ruling itself, HOTC would like to emphasise that this was a preliminary hearing and not a final one. As such, the ERA did not issue any final ruling, including on the matter of whether the suspension was unjustified.

The Executive Committee aims to act as a good employer, considering employment matters carefully, and as a whole. It has acted with the benefit of advice, and will continue to do so until this matter has been concluded."

rnz.co.nz

SHARE ME

More Stories